He is lumping all people on Medicaid in with this one individual. He is attacking every aspect of her life and only pointing out the issues that he took to heart. It's illogical because one person is not a representative to an entire community. He makes giant generalization because he feels she doesn't need free healthcare, while he is using it to illustrate his own deep-seated opinion on the issue.
The second draft of the letter contains more "details" showing why the conclusions from the first draft were jumped to. It still contains the same generalizations and the same appeal to authority as well as to a belief. It appeals to emotion more by describing things within a cinematic set up.
No comments:
Post a Comment